Can You Hear the Suzerain Call?

December, 22, 2022 | 9 Comments


  1. In the PC Game, right…

    “Spent many hours and many playthroughs exploring the game. Absolutely incredible. High marks in storytelling, plot, characters, social commentary, etc…but what makes the game special is how responsive the narrative is to the player. Strong start for Torpor games. Excited to see what they do next.”

    “Suzerain is unlike most things you can play that’s out right now. The choose your own adventure stylings are fascinating, with rabbit trail upon rabbit trail to investigate. Because of this, you’ll be able to play it again and again, and because they do such a great job with the setting and people you’re going to want to.”

    Dr Clare Craig (not one of her impersonators)

    Listen to the concerns these 18 doctors have for their patients regarding covid vaccination. This video has already been removed by Youtube.

    Andrew Bridgen

    Dec 20

    This week I’ve been interviewed by the
    about the emerging evidence that calls into question the safety of mRNA vaccines. You can listen to the full interview here (it’s well worth listening to):

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr

    Watch my podcast with
    where we discuss his new book, “Lies My Gov’t Told Me” and how Americans have been subjected to “military-grade information warfare.”

    Malone to RFK, Jr.: Americans Have Been Subjected to ‘Military-Grade Information Warfare’

    Dr. Robert Malone, an outspoken critic of the COVID-19 vaccines, discussed his new book “Lies My Government Told Me” with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., in a recent episode of “RFK Jr. The Defender Podcast.”

    “Kennedy and Malone discussed the “psychological operations” employed by the U.S. government during the COVID-19 pandemic and earlier in U.S. history that relies on fear and propaganda messaging as tools of social control.”

    Suzerain – “That’s Out Right Now” “Choose Your Own Adventure”

    There is a Clarion Call…

  2. “This progress requires sustained investment in research and supporting infrastructure, including in basic research and high-risk, high-reward undertakings.”

    — Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla

    When operation Warp Speed was launched, nobody at the time seems to have remarked on the fact that by pouring billions of dollars into manufacturing plants for “vaccines” that had not yet even been trialed, they were creating an enterprise that was too big to fail.

  3. From Janette Robb

    But don’t trial results depend on reports from patients? What turns those reports into ‘anecdotes’? Excuse my ignorance…..

    • No they don’t. Trial results hinge on carefully designed questionnaires or lab tests that can only given answers companies are interested in . They do not want to know about reports from patients and not interested in anyone else knowing about such reports.


  4. truth is treason in the empire of lies…

    There are more and more articles like this one, but what they all fail to mention is the disregarding of evidential data in the clinical trials by the investigators as per Augusto Roux and his noteworthy experience at the hands of Fernando Polack.

    For mercy’s sake, how many more must suffer before the Covid jab is declared a danger?

    By Neville Hodgkinson

    December 24, 2022

    Neville Hodgkinson, the former medical and science correspondent of several national newspapers, including the Sunday Times, Sunday Express and Daily Mail

    The clinical trial obviously works in the favour and interests of the ‘drug’ or ‘vaccine’ being tested and it has been almost universally the case from negative trials for antidepressants to almost an undercover operation not to link adverse effects for both.

    Considerable research has been dedicated to clinical trial data here, and what has been shown is that the mighty hand of pharma in so many trials can turn the evidence on it’s head.

    “It has also been good year for vaccine research. A study in June, published in the Lancet, found that Covid-19 vaccines had helped prevent nearly 20 million deaths in their first year of use alone.” Dr. Michael Mosley, Daily Mail 24/12

    More Flaws in the Vaccine Model Claiming 20 Million Lives Saved

    Financial conflicts of interest: Independent of the above technical flaws, there is another important aspect here. The Lancet publication clearly mentions that the funding sources for this work include the WHO, Gavi, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, all of whom have a financial conflict of interest in mass jabs. However, most of the news outlets have left out this critical information. This is inappropriate and unacceptable in honest journalism.

    I would guess that Robert F Kennedy Jr, as close as you can get to US royalty, won’t be joining Albert on the World Stage any time soon, as factions tumble…

  5. This is much better coming from Norman, and worth repeating.
    Add in Romy.

    Prof Norman Fenton

    Why we can’t simply laugh at how ludicrous the Lancet paper was claiming that “the vaxx saved 20 million lives”. Like it or not it is being used to close down debate on vaxx injuries & deaths

    Romy Cerratti

    Romy Cerratti is half German, a quarter Italian and a quarter Peruvian but is proud to be British. She has a masters degree in medieval history from Oxford and is a passionate campaigner on issues of mental health and NHS reform.

    Are doctors trying to ‘normalise’ vaccine damage?


    Romy Cerratti

    December 27, 2022

    ‘DON’T mention the vaccine!’ My mother’s worried admonishment came as she accompanied me to an appointment with our family doctor.  

    She was concerned that I might provoke the GP’s hostility if I suggested my chronic fatigue, icy hands and feet, hormone issues and newly compromised immune system were Covid jab-related.  

    I was worried too. Getting this face-to-face appointment felt like a small miracle and my priority was securing medical help. However, I also felt strongly that I needed to raise the possibility that I was suffering vaccine damage.  

    So, after telling the GP my symptoms and being given a provisional diagnosis of Raynaud’s Disease to explain the cold extremities and a referral to a chronic fatigue specialist, I plucked up courage and spoke.

    ‘I realise this may be controversial, but I think these health problems are related to the Covid vaccines, especially my Pfizer booster,’ I said.  

    I braced myself for a brusque riposte of ‘safe and effective,’ ‘extremely rare side-effects’, etc – the line constantly parroted by the Government and NHS. But, without even blinking, my doctor said through her mask: ‘Oh, that’s not controversial at all, in my experience, that’s not at all uncommon. I’ve had several patients recently with similar symptoms … even a lady today with Raynaud’s Disease, likely related to the boosters.’  

    I’m not often lost for words, but I was struck silent for a while. My mother filled in for me by adding that she too felt her immune system had been weakened by the booster. There was not a flicker of resistance or surprise on my GP’s face. Her reaction was to nod.  

    Afterwards, Mum and I sat in the car outside the surgery and said the same word at the same time – ‘Wow!’ So many emotions and questions have circulated through me since that appointment. I keep hearing my doctor’s voice saying ‘not controversial at all’, ‘not uncommon’. Yet the surgery had displayed an enduring eagerness to vaccinate. 

    Then a thought occurred to me. Rather than repeat the increasingly threadbare ‘safe and effective’ mantra, is there now a whiff of doctors trying to normalise adverse vaccine reactions? The strategy might well be to acknowledge to the patient that the vaccine has caused them harm, but tell them it’s not worth making a fuss about it. After all, as jab-happy proponents such as Health Minister Maria Caulfield love to say, even paracetamol can cause negative effects. Such setbacks are ‘to be expected’ and we must just keep quiet and carry on.  

    Well, if ‘normalising’ vaccine damage is what the medical profession is trying to achieve, it won’t work. The damage caused in many cases is too catastrophic to be so simplistically dismissed.  

    Those of us who have long acknowledged the truth of this won’t be muzzled. We will shout louder and ask more questions. It will be a hard fight, but there is strength in knowing that we are on the right side of history.  

    The Human Touch…

  6. Thanks to Patrick Hahn and Eugyppius
    1 of 2
    Cleveland Clinic Study Finds Efficacy of Pfizer Bivalent Booster Is a Mere Thirty Percent and That the Likelihood …
    Patrick D Hahn from Patrick D Hahn
    5:48 PM (15 minutes ago)

    Open in app or online
    Cleveland Clinic Study Finds Efficacy of Pfizer Bivalent Booster Is a Mere Thirty Percent and That the Likelihood of Reinfection INCREASES with the number of Prior Doses
    DEC 27
    A study released 19 December by the Cleveland Clinic has shown that the real-world efficacy of the bivalent booster shots is a puny thirty percent – far below the figure of fifty percent efficacy then-commissioner of the FDA Stephen Hahn promised us way back in August of 2020. How long even this paltry effect lasts is an open question, given that the boosters were made available just last September, and the maximum follow-up time was ninety-eight days.

    Perhaps more disturbingly, the likelihood of contacting COVID-19 after the bivalent booster INCREASES with the number of prior shots, in a step-wise, dose-dependent fashion. Those who got the bivalent shot after three or more prior doses had three times the likelihood of subsequent infection as those who had none. Normally this sort of thing is considered proof of a cause-and-effect relationship.

    In fairness, it ought to be pointed out there may be potential confounders here. It could be that individuals who got the most prior doses were the ones most at risk for COVID-19. However, the researchers themselves nixed the idea, noting that the majority of subjects (all of whom were Cleveland Clinic employees) were young and all were eligible to have received at least three or more doses, and all had ample opportunity to do so. The researchers also noted that such individuals probably are more likely to engage in risky behaviors than their fully-vaxxed counterparts – and yet their rate of infection was lower.

    How can this be? Thomas Francis, the scientist who first isolated the flu virus, found that when subjects are exposed to a particular strain of the virus, the antibodies they produce bind most strongly not to that particular strain but to the strain that was most prevalent when the subject was a child. It was as if, once the immune system is trained to “see” a particular strain of the virus, it can “see” only that strain and no other. He called this phenomenon “original antigenic sin.”

    Since then original antigenic sin has been documented for a variety of viral infections, not just in humans but in animals as well. How this happens is nowhere near as important as that it happens, but one possible explanation is that when the novel strain of pathogen invades the body, the memory B-cells produces antibodies which bind to the pathogen, but only weakly. These memory B-cells than are stimulated to divide and produce more cells which produce more antibodies which bind weakly, while other B-cells that might have done a better job never get a chance to do so.

    On the other hand, there already was ample evidence that the risk of myocarditis (probably the most common and best-documented toxic effect of the vax) rises with the number of doses (click here and here for details).

    It remains to be seen whether these findings will cause government regulatory agencies to temper their calls for repeated booster shots.

    Thanks for reading Patrick D Hahn! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

    5:47 PM (19 minutes ago)
    Open in app or online
    New research suggests that repeated mRNA vaccination induces limited immune tolerance for the spike protein
    Once again, it is time to stop vaccinating.
    DEC 27

    These are IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4 antibody levels in 29 study participants before vaccination (“before”), ten days after dose 1 (“post 1st”), ten days after dose 2 (“post 2nd”), 210 days after dose 2 (“FU post 2nd”), ten days after dose 3 (“post 3rd”), and 180 days after dose 3 (“FU post 3rd”). Ten of the 29 participants were infected after their third dose; their antibody levels are marked in grey. IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies trigger broader, inflammatory immune responses to clear infection. IgG2 and IgG4 antibodies, meanwhile, do very roughly the opposite. Repeated mRNA vaccination is associated with lower levels of the key infection-fighting IgG3 antibody, and much higher levels of the antigen-tolerating IgG4 antibody, especially in vaccinees who suffered breakthrough infections.
    “Class switch towards non-inflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination” is the title of a new Science: Immunology paper by researchers at Erlangen, in Germany.

    I write about this with reluctance, partly because it’s already been covered by friends-of-the blog Rintrah Radagast, el gato malo, Igor Chudov and now Alex Berenson; partly because I really think that whatever is happening or will happen with Corona, we desperately need to transition to a world where we stop worrying about virus infections, particularly infections with Corona; and I’m still not convinced of the significance of these findings. But, this is also a plague chronicle, and I won’t ignore anything here.

    In short, it looks like repeated mRNA vaccination induces a partial immune tolerance of the spike protein. Adenovirus vector vaccines don’t cause this tolerance. The spike protein on its own doesn’t either. Nor do vaccines against other pathogens cause this kind of tolerance for their respective antigens. Everything suggests it’s a property of the mRNA technology in particular…

    Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
    Subscribe to eugyppius: a plague chronicle to keep reading this post and get 7

  7. Hiatus moments – Ro and Ro…

    Cleveland Clinic is Popular…

    Senator Ron Johnson

    It appears others around the world are publicly acknowledging COVID-19 vaccine injuries are real and must be dealt with.

    When will U.S. medical authorities admit what is obvious?

    Top Japanese Physician-Scientist Gives Dire Warning About COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: ‘Scientifically Misconceived’

    Senator Ron Johnson

    I want to sincerely thank @YouTube for reversing their removal and reinstating the excellent documentary on COVID-19 vaccine injuries “Anecdotal.” I highly recommend everyone watch and share it.

    Senator Ron Johnson

    I wonder if @NIH @CDCgov and @US_FDA will even acknowledge this Cleveland Clinic study on the bivalent boosters? If so, what will their response be?

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr

    New study found a 9-times increased rate of myocarditis after mRNA booster.

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr

    Yet another of Britain’s leading vaccine supporters has studied the data and switched sides!

    Time to pause covid mass vaccination

    Dr. John Campbell 

    Published December 28, 2022 


  8. A brief history lesson…

    Covid mRNA vaccines, 1 serious event per 800 vaccinees, Vaccine officially promoted


    Dr Aseem Malhotra

    The distraction from the elephant in the room continues. The evidence of common serious harm to the cardiovascular system from the mRNA jab is overwhelming. The CMO must call for it’s complete suspension immediately otherwise he will continue to be on the wrong side of history.

    The Times and The Sunday Times

    NEW: Thousands of middle-aged people are dying of heart conditions because they did not get statins or blood pressure medicines during the pandemic, Sir Chris Whitty has warned ministers

    It’s not Andrew Witty; it’s Chris Whitty…

    Chris Whitty warns thousands of middle-aged people are dying of heart conditions that went untreated during the Covid pandemic as patients missed out on statins and blood pressure pills

    ‘People’s reluctance to bother the NHS with apparently routine conditions after pleas to stay at home except for emergencies during 2020 and last year is thought to be contributing to a surge in excess deaths since the spring. At present about 800 more people a week are dying than normal, only half of which is because of Covid.

    Although the reasons….

    ‘it was important to be ‘transparent coming out of Covid around excess deaths’

    Pushing-out, W(h)itty…

Leave a Reply