A Suzerain is a Superior Feudal Lord to whom fealty is due – an Overlord. A Suzerain is a dominant power controlling the foreign relations of a vassal state but allowing it sovereign authority in its internal affairs.
This post needs to be read in conjunction with Twas the NICE Before Christmas.
The leaders of G7 (US, UK, France, Canada, Germany, Italy, and Japan along with a representative of the EU), and other powerful people, like Albert Bourla, Pfizer’s CEO, met in England in 2021. A set of agreements were issued of which this Research Compact was one.
As Open Societies with democratic values we believe in academic freedom. The freedom to pursue intellectual enquiry and to innovate allows us to make progress on shared issues and drive forward the frontiers of knowledge and discovery for the benefit of the entire world. We recognise that research and innovation are fundamentally global endeavours. Nations, citizens, institutions, and businesses have made huge strides forward, not otherwise possible, through open research collaboration across borders. Working together we will use our position as leading science nations to collaborate on global challenges, increase the transparency and integrity of research, and facilitate data free flow with trust to drive innovation and advance knowledge.
The global response to COVID-19 has demonstrated the progress that arises from long-term collaboration which puts science at the heart of prevention, preparedness, response, recovery and resilience. This progress requires sustained investment in research and supporting infrastructure, including in basic research and high-risk, high-reward undertakings. As our nations and communities start to recover from the pandemic and build resilience for future shocks, we will continue to work with our research and business communities to remove barriers to the open and rapid sharing of knowledge, data and tools, to the greatest extent possible, recognising the importance of research security in particular in cutting-edge fields, and to promote open science and increase open, safe and transparent dissemination of science to citizens, and to strive to minimise technology-related risk.
We can only tackle the greatest challenges that we face and will face over coming decades – such as climate change, pandemics and biodiversity loss – through transparent, open and agile research collaboration. We must bring the widest possible range of resources, expertise and perspectives to bear on solutions which will benefit people across the globe.
We commit to promoting international research cooperation and the conditions of freedom, independence, openness, reciprocity and transparency under which it flourishes. Our governments have the right and responsibility to effectively ensure the security and integrity of the research ecosystem, in partnership with the research community, preventing the theft, misuse and inappropriate exploitation of our intellectual property and personal data, and other forms of misconduct.
We are committed to developing a strong, diverse and resilient science and research community which is inclusive of all groups, as recognised by the Working Group on Financing Science for Inclusive Growth. It is important to deepen participation of underserved, underrepresented and marginalised communities and expand their participation in the research and innovation ecosystem. Inclusion will enhance the strength of our research base and increase momentum on dismantling the social, legal, and regulatory barriers limiting participation, and complementing our G7 gender equality goals by tackling gender gaps. Principles and practices of inclusive growth distribute the benefits of science among diverse communities and regions across the G7 and beyond.
Openness, reciprocity and cooperation are shared G7 values. We commit to work together to uphold and protect the principles that underpin effective international collaboration that is as open as possible and as secure as necessary. To facilitate this, we support continued collaboration on Open Science through continuation of the existing G7 Working Group and establishing a new Working Group on the Security and Integrity of the Research Ecosystem. In light of this, the G7 nations commit to work together to:
Because Fiction has to make sense, George Orwell made sure that readers of Nineteen Eighty Four could easily decipher Newspeak. Unless you work on the inside for the Suzerain, however, you may not be able to make sense of this Research Compact. The words seem to say things we should all applaud.
The G7 Compact was published before the news broke that Pfizer, with FDA’s collaboration, intended to block access to the data from the trial that brought Comirnaty, the ‘Pfizer’ ‘vaccine’, on the market for 75 years at least. So much for Data Access.
Moderna, Johnson and Johnson, and Astra-Zeneca still do not intend to offer access to the ‘data’ from their trials. There is, and for 30 years has been, no more access to the data from company drug trials, than there is to their vaccine trials. See Where Does the Misinformation Come From?
Yes, Judge Pittman has said Pfizer have to provide their trial data long before 75 years are up, but there are all sorts of ways for Pfizer to subvert the Judge’s intentions. The vaccine trials effectively ended two years ago when all those taking placebo were offered the chance to get vaccinated. Some were faced with the fact that without a vaccine they couldn’t travel or work. But the official end of the trial is in 2024 and Pfizer can avail of this and hold out presenting key data until this point, and all the time it will take to produce a final analysis of the data, have passed.
Even then there will be no access to the data. No one will know who the people are. But for Augusto Roux’s persistence, no one would have been able to ask 12312982 whether he really did withdraw from the trial for personal reasons. No one would have been able to work out that the mental health problems he was recorded as having were bogus – See Disappeared in Argentina and August is the Cruellest Month.
People are the data in clinical trials – not figures. None of the hundreds of trial participants categorized as protocol deviations in the Pfizer trial, and eliminated, or eliminated from other company studies, can be asked exactly what happened to them. Not even FDA can ask them.
Companies not only make it impossible to track down people but have also engineered a situation where no matter how compelling the narrative a person, or some relative, might offer, everybody – the editors of the NEJM, BMJ, Lancet, JAMA, writers of guidelines like the NICE Guidelines – see Twas the NICE before Christmas – regulators like FDA, MHRA, EMA etc, and politicians – will bow and scrape and say these are nothing but anecdotes.
Ian Hudson, ex-GSK and now ex-boss of the UK regulator, MHRA, and all company people say that unless a problem has been demonstrated to occur to a statistically significant extent on a drug, it is anecdotal. This is as fantasy a world as an assassin claiming he was innocent on the basis that Hudson’s death was anecdotal – Once is Nothing as Milan Kundera said in The Unbearable Lightness of Being.
As I am not a Number and The Sovereign Individual show, companies are after our data, our figures, in another way also. Just as Google and Facebook want the traces of our touches on a keyboard, our data exhaust, and from this can predict an extraordinary amount about us, so pharma and other health service companies, like the Mayo Clinic, now want our health data exhaust.
There is nothing about this that is designed to help us or care for us. It is all about shifting product. In the near future, simulacra made from our health data, will be more real than either you or I. The only remaining fly in the ointment for companies will be any hint that we retain residual traces of a capacity for independent judgement.
Another bit of Newspeak lies in the idea companies run clinical trials. They don’t. They run assay systems designed to get their drug on the market. An assay means producing figures that allow a regulator to tick a box and license a company to use a word like vaccine or antidepressant or whatever.
These studies do not explore what this drug in fact does to people. They can be and are designed to conceal the harms the drugs cause.
When a regulator licences a drug, it does not mean that this drug or vaccine saves lives – vanishingly few drugs save lives in company studies and no recent ‘vaccines’ do. In these studies more people die on the drug or vaccine than on placebo. And there is no evidence of a restoration of function. All that the study will have shown is a minimal change on some rating scale and this is all a regulator needs to approve the drug. See Love in a Time of Covid.
Studies that fail to show even this minimal change on a rating scale – negative studies – are routinely published as showing the drug or vaccine is entirely safe and works well. Regulators like FDA, Health Canada, EMA in Europe and others pay no heed to these essentially fraudulent practice.
When an outfit like Ventavia can shamelessly produce adverts like this – See Eric Rubin Boston Strangler – there is very little hope for any of us.
Two earlier posts bear on these points and company interests in controlled data access – Mark and Barb, Eric and Carole along with Harmatology. The G7 Research Compact stands as a testament to the efforts of Pfizer, other pharmaceutical companies, and New England health service and medical interests, in the form of the Multi-Regional Clinical Trials (MRCT) organization set up a little over a decade ago to produce exactly the outcome seen in this Research Compact.
In our times a middle ground critical to society, community and our humanity has vanished. Samizdat was set up just before COVID and its vaccines rolled out. It aimed at hanging on to the then rapidly diminishing scraps of middle ground. The Vaccines have since obliterated any scraps that were left.
A middle ground, a place where people of differing opinions can engage, depends on something outside of our selves that creates a space the way a tent pole creates a tent. When the tent pole collapses, the space to engage vanishes. Unable to cooperate, we are more likely to struggle.
For five or six centuries Religion has been the pole that held things up. Even as we secularized, a set of shared values, a shared morality, played a similar role.
The Law also stood as something to which both rich and poor were in principle subject.
In the last two centuries, science has helped hold up the sky – provide a vertical dimension. This was not a science constituted by the figures to which the G7 Research Compact appeals. This science focused on data but it hinged on judgement calls about what the data likely meant. It did not surrender judgement to figures.
Within medicine, this science and the values linked to it have collapsed.
There is no other word appropriate when a supposedly scientific literature is almost entirely ghostwritten, when access to the people who were in a study is forbidden, and when the judgements of people who get to examine and cross-examine a person injured by treatment – the only point where all relevant data are in the frame at the same time – are dismissed.
Without a common ground on which we can engage, there can only be a reversion to a struggle in which the strongest survive. Rather than depend on the Law or Science to guarantee our Rights to Speak, for most people the sensible thing is to pledge allegiance to the strongest man around.
As Sanna Marin, Premier of Finland, put it baldly, quite recently, in this void, caught between great powers, European States depend completely on the United States. Finland and other States are now Vassals.
Is the United States a Suzerain power that lets it’s European Vassals exert Sovereingty within their own borders? Are these countries allowed to entertain the possibility that my story or yours are not just anecdotes but offer compelling evidence that vaccines or drugs can harm? The once citizens of these countries have become serfs with those who retain a memory of the rule of law and norms of science now outcasts – on the run.
Is Albert Bourla standing at the US Presidential Lectern as a member of a ruling class that includes the CEOs of companies like Google, all marching in lockstep with the US Military?
Health has become a key military concern – see Military Maneuvers. The US military in particular have led the way in making Biopower a literal reality. Michel Foucault, inventor of the biopower soundbite, could not have imagined a reality like this or its juxtaposition with the most rapidly falling life expectancy of any developed nation.
The United States appears to be splintering into warring parties that increasingly look like they have no values in common. What happens if a Suzerain stumbles?
To be continued
Copyright © Data Based Medicine Americas Ltd.
In the PC Game, right…
“Spent many hours and many playthroughs exploring the game. Absolutely incredible. High marks in storytelling, plot, characters, social commentary, etc…but what makes the game special is how responsive the narrative is to the player. Strong start for Torpor games. Excited to see what they do next.”
“Suzerain is unlike most things you can play that’s out right now. The choose your own adventure stylings are fascinating, with rabbit trail upon rabbit trail to investigate. Because of this, you’ll be able to play it again and again, and because they do such a great job with the setting and people you’re going to want to.”
Dr Clare Craig (not one of her impersonators)
Listen to the concerns these 18 doctors have for their patients regarding covid vaccination. This video has already been removed by Youtube.
This week I’ve been interviewed by the
about the emerging evidence that calls into question the safety of mRNA vaccines. You can listen to the full interview here (it’s well worth listening to):
Robert F. Kennedy Jr
Watch my podcast with
where we discuss his new book, “Lies My Gov’t Told Me” and how Americans have been subjected to “military-grade information warfare.”
Malone to RFK, Jr.: Americans Have Been Subjected to ‘Military-Grade Information Warfare’
Dr. Robert Malone, an outspoken critic of the COVID-19 vaccines, discussed his new book “Lies My Government Told Me” with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., in a recent episode of “RFK Jr. The Defender Podcast.”
“Kennedy and Malone discussed the “psychological operations” employed by the U.S. government during the COVID-19 pandemic and earlier in U.S. history that relies on fear and propaganda messaging as tools of social control.”
Suzerain – “That’s Out Right Now” “Choose Your Own Adventure”
There is a Clarion Call…
“This progress requires sustained investment in research and supporting infrastructure, including in basic research and high-risk, high-reward undertakings.”
— Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla
When operation Warp Speed was launched, nobody at the time seems to have remarked on the fact that by pouring billions of dollars into manufacturing plants for “vaccines” that had not yet even been trialed, they were creating an enterprise that was too big to fail.
From Janette Robb
But don’t trial results depend on reports from patients? What turns those reports into ‘anecdotes’? Excuse my ignorance…..
No they don’t. Trial results hinge on carefully designed questionnaires or lab tests that can only given answers companies are interested in . They do not want to know about reports from patients and not interested in anyone else knowing about such reports.
truth is treason in the empire of lies…
There are more and more articles like this one, but what they all fail to mention is the disregarding of evidential data in the clinical trials by the investigators as per Augusto Roux and his noteworthy experience at the hands of Fernando Polack.
For mercy’s sake, how many more must suffer before the Covid jab is declared a danger?
By Neville Hodgkinson
December 24, 2022
Neville Hodgkinson, the former medical and science correspondent of several national newspapers, including the Sunday Times, Sunday Express and Daily Mail
The clinical trial obviously works in the favour and interests of the ‘drug’ or ‘vaccine’ being tested and it has been almost universally the case from negative trials for antidepressants to almost an undercover operation not to link adverse effects for both.
Considerable research has been dedicated to clinical trial data here, and what has been shown is that the mighty hand of pharma in so many trials can turn the evidence on it’s head.
“It has also been good year for vaccine research. A study in June, published in the Lancet, found that Covid-19 vaccines had helped prevent nearly 20 million deaths in their first year of use alone.” Dr. Michael Mosley, Daily Mail 24/12
More Flaws in the Vaccine Model Claiming 20 Million Lives Saved
Financial conflicts of interest: Independent of the above technical flaws, there is another important aspect here. The Lancet publication clearly mentions that the funding sources for this work include the WHO, Gavi, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, all of whom have a financial conflict of interest in mass jabs. However, most of the news outlets have left out this critical information. This is inappropriate and unacceptable in honest journalism.
I would guess that Robert F Kennedy Jr, as close as you can get to US royalty, won’t be joining Albert on the World Stage any time soon, as factions tumble…
This is much better coming from Norman, and worth repeating.
Add in Romy.
Prof Norman Fenton
Why we can’t simply laugh at how ludicrous the Lancet paper was claiming that “the vaxx saved 20 million lives”. Like it or not it is being used to close down debate on vaxx injuries & deaths
Romy Cerratti is half German, a quarter Italian and a quarter Peruvian but is proud to be British. She has a masters degree in medieval history from Oxford and is a passionate campaigner on issues of mental health and NHS reform.
Are doctors trying to ‘normalise’ vaccine damage?
December 27, 2022
‘DON’T mention the vaccine!’ My mother’s worried admonishment came as she accompanied me to an appointment with our family doctor.
She was concerned that I might provoke the GP’s hostility if I suggested my chronic fatigue, icy hands and feet, hormone issues and newly compromised immune system were Covid jab-related.
I was worried too. Getting this face-to-face appointment felt like a small miracle and my priority was securing medical help. However, I also felt strongly that I needed to raise the possibility that I was suffering vaccine damage.
So, after telling the GP my symptoms and being given a provisional diagnosis of Raynaud’s Disease to explain the cold extremities and a referral to a chronic fatigue specialist, I plucked up courage and spoke.
‘I realise this may be controversial, but I think these health problems are related to the Covid vaccines, especially my Pfizer booster,’ I said.
I braced myself for a brusque riposte of ‘safe and effective,’ ‘extremely rare side-effects’, etc – the line constantly parroted by the Government and NHS. But, without even blinking, my doctor said through her mask: ‘Oh, that’s not controversial at all, in my experience, that’s not at all uncommon. I’ve had several patients recently with similar symptoms … even a lady today with Raynaud’s Disease, likely related to the boosters.’
I’m not often lost for words, but I was struck silent for a while. My mother filled in for me by adding that she too felt her immune system had been weakened by the booster. There was not a flicker of resistance or surprise on my GP’s face. Her reaction was to nod.
Afterwards, Mum and I sat in the car outside the surgery and said the same word at the same time – ‘Wow!’ So many emotions and questions have circulated through me since that appointment. I keep hearing my doctor’s voice saying ‘not controversial at all’, ‘not uncommon’. Yet the surgery had displayed an enduring eagerness to vaccinate.
Then a thought occurred to me. Rather than repeat the increasingly threadbare ‘safe and effective’ mantra, is there now a whiff of doctors trying to normalise adverse vaccine reactions? The strategy might well be to acknowledge to the patient that the vaccine has caused them harm, but tell them it’s not worth making a fuss about it. After all, as jab-happy proponents such as Health Minister Maria Caulfield love to say, even paracetamol can cause negative effects. Such setbacks are ‘to be expected’ and we must just keep quiet and carry on.
Well, if ‘normalising’ vaccine damage is what the medical profession is trying to achieve, it won’t work. The damage caused in many cases is too catastrophic to be so simplistically dismissed.
Those of us who have long acknowledged the truth of this won’t be muzzled. We will shout louder and ask more questions. It will be a hard fight, but there is strength in knowing that we are on the right side of history.
The Human Touch…
Thanks to Patrick Hahn and Eugyppius
1 of 2
Cleveland Clinic Study Finds Efficacy of Pfizer Bivalent Booster Is a Mere Thirty Percent and That the Likelihood …
Patrick D Hahn from Patrick D Hahn
5:48 PM (15 minutes ago)
Open in app or online
Cleveland Clinic Study Finds Efficacy of Pfizer Bivalent Booster Is a Mere Thirty Percent and That the Likelihood of Reinfection INCREASES with the number of Prior Doses
PATRICK D HAHN
A study released 19 December by the Cleveland Clinic has shown that the real-world efficacy of the bivalent booster shots is a puny thirty percent – far below the figure of fifty percent efficacy then-commissioner of the FDA Stephen Hahn promised us way back in August of 2020. How long even this paltry effect lasts is an open question, given that the boosters were made available just last September, and the maximum follow-up time was ninety-eight days.
Perhaps more disturbingly, the likelihood of contacting COVID-19 after the bivalent booster INCREASES with the number of prior shots, in a step-wise, dose-dependent fashion. Those who got the bivalent shot after three or more prior doses had three times the likelihood of subsequent infection as those who had none. Normally this sort of thing is considered proof of a cause-and-effect relationship.
In fairness, it ought to be pointed out there may be potential confounders here. It could be that individuals who got the most prior doses were the ones most at risk for COVID-19. However, the researchers themselves nixed the idea, noting that the majority of subjects (all of whom were Cleveland Clinic employees) were young and all were eligible to have received at least three or more doses, and all had ample opportunity to do so. The researchers also noted that such individuals probably are more likely to engage in risky behaviors than their fully-vaxxed counterparts – and yet their rate of infection was lower.
How can this be? Thomas Francis, the scientist who first isolated the flu virus, found that when subjects are exposed to a particular strain of the virus, the antibodies they produce bind most strongly not to that particular strain but to the strain that was most prevalent when the subject was a child. It was as if, once the immune system is trained to “see” a particular strain of the virus, it can “see” only that strain and no other. He called this phenomenon “original antigenic sin.”
Since then original antigenic sin has been documented for a variety of viral infections, not just in humans but in animals as well. How this happens is nowhere near as important as that it happens, but one possible explanation is that when the novel strain of pathogen invades the body, the memory B-cells produces antibodies which bind to the pathogen, but only weakly. These memory B-cells than are stimulated to divide and produce more cells which produce more antibodies which bind weakly, while other B-cells that might have done a better job never get a chance to do so.
On the other hand, there already was ample evidence that the risk of myocarditis (probably the most common and best-documented toxic effect of the vax) rises with the number of doses (click here and here for details).
It remains to be seen whether these findings will cause government regulatory agencies to temper their calls for repeated booster shots.
Thanks for reading Patrick D Hahn! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
5:47 PM (19 minutes ago)
Open in app or online
New research suggests that repeated mRNA vaccination induces limited immune tolerance for the spike protein
Once again, it is time to stop vaccinating.
These are IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4 antibody levels in 29 study participants before vaccination (“before”), ten days after dose 1 (“post 1st”), ten days after dose 2 (“post 2nd”), 210 days after dose 2 (“FU post 2nd”), ten days after dose 3 (“post 3rd”), and 180 days after dose 3 (“FU post 3rd”). Ten of the 29 participants were infected after their third dose; their antibody levels are marked in grey. IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies trigger broader, inflammatory immune responses to clear infection. IgG2 and IgG4 antibodies, meanwhile, do very roughly the opposite. Repeated mRNA vaccination is associated with lower levels of the key infection-fighting IgG3 antibody, and much higher levels of the antigen-tolerating IgG4 antibody, especially in vaccinees who suffered breakthrough infections.
“Class switch towards non-inflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination” is the title of a new Science: Immunology paper by researchers at Erlangen, in Germany.
I write about this with reluctance, partly because it’s already been covered by friends-of-the blog Rintrah Radagast, el gato malo, Igor Chudov and now Alex Berenson; partly because I really think that whatever is happening or will happen with Corona, we desperately need to transition to a world where we stop worrying about virus infections, particularly infections with Corona; and I’m still not convinced of the significance of these findings. But, this is also a plague chronicle, and I won’t ignore anything here.
In short, it looks like repeated mRNA vaccination induces a partial immune tolerance of the spike protein. Adenovirus vector vaccines don’t cause this tolerance. The spike protein on its own doesn’t either. Nor do vaccines against other pathogens cause this kind of tolerance for their respective antigens. Everything suggests it’s a property of the mRNA technology in particular…
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to eugyppius: a plague chronicle to keep reading this post and get 7
Hiatus moments – Ro and Ro…
Cleveland Clinic is Popular…
Senator Ron Johnson
It appears others around the world are publicly acknowledging COVID-19 vaccine injuries are real and must be dealt with.
When will U.S. medical authorities admit what is obvious?
Top Japanese Physician-Scientist Gives Dire Warning About COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: ‘Scientifically Misconceived’
Senator Ron Johnson
I want to sincerely thank @YouTube for reversing their removal and reinstating the excellent documentary on COVID-19 vaccine injuries “Anecdotal.” I highly recommend everyone watch and share it.
Senator Ron Johnson
I wonder if @NIH @CDCgov and @US_FDA will even acknowledge this Cleveland Clinic study on the bivalent boosters? If so, what will their response be?
Robert F. Kennedy Jr
New study found a 9-times increased rate of myocarditis after mRNA booster.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr
Yet another of Britain’s leading vaccine supporters has studied the data and switched sides!
Time to pause covid mass vaccination
Dr. John Campbell
Published December 28, 2022
A brief history lesson…
Covid mRNA vaccines, 1 serious event per 800 vaccinees, Vaccine officially promoted
Dr Aseem Malhotra
The distraction from the elephant in the room continues. The evidence of common serious harm to the cardiovascular system from the mRNA jab is overwhelming. The CMO must call for it’s complete suspension immediately otherwise he will continue to be on the wrong side of history.
The Times and The Sunday Times
NEW: Thousands of middle-aged people are dying of heart conditions because they did not get statins or blood pressure medicines during the pandemic, Sir Chris Whitty has warned ministers
It’s not Andrew Witty; it’s Chris Whitty…
Chris Whitty warns thousands of middle-aged people are dying of heart conditions that went untreated during the Covid pandemic as patients missed out on statins and blood pressure pills
‘People’s reluctance to bother the NHS with apparently routine conditions after pleas to stay at home except for emergencies during 2020 and last year is thought to be contributing to a surge in excess deaths since the spring. At present about 800 more people a week are dying than normal, only half of which is because of Covid.
Although the reasons….
‘it was important to be ‘transparent coming out of Covid around excess deaths’