Disappeared in Argentina

March, 1, 2022 | 17 Comments


  1. Thankfully there are a few of the probably many who have been harmed and fobbed off who are getting to know about your team. Is there some outreach happening or publicity to recruit others? I notice that Augusto and Brianne are quite knowledgeable about their biology and able to take action which is generously helping others.. The majority though will be cast off without any record or respect for what they suffer as ‘volunteers’ Would it be possible to recruit people who are described as ‘vaccine hesitant’ but decide to go ahead to carry out real time observation independantly by Rxisk/ DH ?
    Surely there can be no legal objection to that decision . Can imagine ‘confientiality issues’ if attempting to recruit but would it be possible to monitor recruits independantly while taking part in trials? And follow them up in real time ?. As it is we have to rely on corrupt networks after damage has been done and events cannot be back tracked very easily .
    I would just emphasise that the dishonest label of mental illness needs to be addressed on any medical record. Most who visit the blogs know what that can lead to. Extremely useful to label ‘anxiety’ as mental illness which would follow most people around and create even more harm.

    • Thank you Susanne. ‘The dishonest label(S) of mental illness needs to be addressed on any medical record’.
      “It is in breach of Argentinian law — – to have diagnosed someone with a medical condition that the person does not have – and to have entered it into his medical record”.
      This should apply to all Medical Practice.
      Psychiatric labels are Labels-For-Life.
      Were those who so callously, (and with such indifference to accurate differential diagnosis), misdiagnose adverse drug reactions (and psychotropic drug withdrawal syndromes) as Serious Mental Illness be held accountable: How many thousands would no longer be/ never have been – ‘mentally ill’? How much iatrogenic physical, emotional, social and economic injury (and death) be prevented?
      “Depressive Psychosis is vanishingly rare compared to treatment induced AKATHISIA”.
      “But the most pernicious of all is that the system appears to have a complete inability to appreciate when the treatment it gives becomes the problem that it tries to treat by adding more drugs, and if need be detain us in order to do so”.
      The suffering caused by misdiagnosis, denial and ignorance of adverse drug reactions MUST surely be addressed, recognised and compensated?

      • “The suffering caused by misdiagnosis, denial and ignorance of adverse drug reactions MUST surely be addressed, recognised and compensated?”

        Don’t think there is a cat in hells chance, at least at this time


        Keep on sharing your information… it is knowledge that can save lives

  2. As well as being a member of the Cause and Efect Team J Witt-Doerring runs a private practice . It maybe expensive but considering how much money is wasted chasing after treatments , remedies and possible cures, trusted experts may be an option for some to consider

    Main Menu
    Psychiatric Care From the Comfort of Your Home
    Welcome to Witt-Doerring Psychiatric Consulting
    We provide online psychiatric care in the comfort of your home, office or any secure location.

    Our practice is currently active in AZ, CO, GA, MD, NM, PA, TN, TX and UT.

    Controlled substances prescribing is currently available in Utah.

    Contact us Today to Schedule an Appointment
    Request Appointment
    Practice Expertise

    Drug Tapering
    We collaborate with our patients to create flexible tapering plans to address protracted withdrawal syndromes or those wishing to discontinue long-term medications safely
    Diagnostic Clarification
    We provide a second opinions on psychiatric diagnoses and treatment options
    Side Effect Management
    We specialize in identifying and managing drug-induced side-effects
    Expert Witness
    We specialize in the accurate identification of psychiatric adverse drug reactions

    The Pillars of Our Practice

    Together, we have worked in pharmaceutical, regulatory, academic, and clinical settings. We have a deep understanding of the research supporting the benefits and harms of psychiatric interventions.

    Visits are often scheduled when they are needed the most rather than at standard, predetermined intervals. Ongoing communication is maintained through our secure patient portal messaging system so we can follow progress in between visits or discuss any issues that arise.

    Individualized Care
    As an out-of-network practice (we do not accept insurance), we carry a much lower patient load and avoid time-heavy administrative duties. You will have more time with your physician and increased access to them when needed.

  3. This is very quickly developing in to Paul John Scott Malcharist territory – who had a nose for the scent of betrayal – the narrative drive of a crime thriller


    Clinical Trials –

    Augusto was discharged on the September 14 with a diagnosis of adverse reaction to coronavirus vaccine (high probability)

    He is very angry at being given a mental illness he never had, with this entered into his medical record.

    Juan Gérvas Retweeted

    Serena Tinari

    Another batch of trials’ documents on Pfizer #COVID19 vaccine released on March 1 by @US_FDA
    For this to happen, we Public Health & Medical Professionals for #Transparency had to sue the agency: https://phmpt.org/#signthedemand As usual, the docs are now public:

    Docs – A Plot-line to Die For…


    Oh, What a Circus…

  4. Is there a water cooler area where we can discuss current events? I’d like to get Dr. Healy’s take on 22 y.o. Katie Meyer, who allegedly committed suicide.

  5. Unintended Consequences of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19

    BY Joseph Mercola


    “we are dropping the wrong bomb on the wrong target at the wrong time!”

    Moonshot: Inside Pfizer’s Nine-Month Race to Make the Impossible Possible Hardcover – March 8, 2022

    by Dr. Albert Bourla


    The exclusive, first-hand, behind-the-scenes story of how Pfizer raced to create the first Covid-19 vaccine, told by Pfizer’s Chairman and CEO Dr. Albert Bourla.

    A riveting, fast-paced, inside look at one of the most incredible private sector achievements in history, Moonshot recounts the intensive nine months in 2020 when the scientists at Pfizer, under the visionary leadership of Dr. Albert Bourla, made “the impossible possible”—creating, testing, and manufacturing a safe and effective Covid-19 vaccine that previously would have taken years to develop. 

    Dr. Bourla chronicles how the brilliant, dedicated minds at Pfizer, under the enormous strains of the global pandemic, overcame a series of crises that were compounded by social and political unrest, and reveals the doubts, decisions, obstacles, and failures they encountered. As Dr. Bourla makes clear, Pfizer’s success wasn’t due to luck; it was because of preparation driven by four simple values—Courage, Excellence, Equity, and Joy.

    Moonshot is a story of leadership under the most unprecedented circumstances—how Dr. Bourla, a Greek immigrant, a child of Holocaust survivors, and a veterinarian, became the head of one of the world’s largest corporations and initiated a dramatic transformation of the organization just before a global health crisis would serve to test the organization, its scientists, and its leader, like never before. Moonshot describes best practices that can be used to address the multiple, unprecedented challenges our world faces, reveals Pfizer’s implementation of scientific breakthroughs at a record-breaking pace, and offers leadership lessons that can help anyone successfully manage their own seemingly unsolvable problems. As Dr. Bourla explains, “I am sharing the story of our moonshot—the challenges we faced, the lessons we learned, and the core values that allowed us to make it happen—in hopes that it might inspire and inform your own moonshot, whatever that may be.”

  6. Just completed MHRA consultation document open till March re what changes they should make. one priority is public opinion and of course ‘experts by experience’.. It’s not even April 1st yet June.

    Sunday, March 6, 2022

    The deafening silence of Dame June Raine

    Gillian Dymond
    March 6, 2022
    ON November 12, 2021, I wrote an open letter to Dr June Raine, head of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), asking her to investigate the unprecedented number of deaths and injuries occurring shortly after injection with the novel (I would say experimental) Covid-19 medications, as reported by the Yellow Card system. The letter was published in TCW. The weeks passed, and Dr Raine offered no response. …… Accordingly, I sent the following reminder:

    Dear Dr Raine,
    More than two months have passed since I wrote to you regarding your delay in looking into more than one-and-a-quarter million reports of adverse events suffered by members of the public following treatment with the novel medications which have been passed for emergency use only in response to SARS-CoV-2. I have received neither a reply nor an acknowledgement of my letter, a copy of which is enclosed herewith.

    The number of reported deaths and injuries occurring after treatment with these novel medications continues to rise. Government records now show that no fewer than 1,414,293 adverse reactions involving 431,482 individuals have been reported to date, including 1,932 deaths; of particular concern are the abnormal numbers of miscarriages and stillbirths which have occurred post injection, yet it seems that you have still taken no steps to verify the Yellow Card data, or to assess the comparative risks they indicate for different sections of the population. Meanwhile, evidence regarding the inefficacy of the medications concerned is growing daily. Should even a fraction of the deaths and injuries reported be confirmed, the risk/benefit ratio requires that they be withdrawn immediately.

    Your dereliction of duty is enabling the unfair treatment of those who are sensibly waiting until they are in a position to give their informed consent, as required under traditional medical ethics and the Nuremberg Code. Because of your failure to present them with the information which they need before they can give that consent, many of these prudent people are now facing state-dependency, as their employers, presumably unaware of the mounting counter-indications, are giving them the choice of either losing their livelihoods or submitting to an invasive medical procedure which may potentially cost them their lives.

    As I pointed out in my previous letter, I am one of those relying on the MHRA, as the agency tasked with preventing my exposure to unsafe medications, to indicate the degree of danger I may face should I be coerced into accepting a medical treatment which has not undergone all the normally required stages of testing, and whose long-term effects are impossible to determine. If you have, in fact, been doing your duty and investigating the Yellow Card data with a view to advising the public, please tell me where I may access your conclusions. If not, please inform me of the reasons for your extreme vaccine-investigation hesitancy.

    This letter was posted recorded delivery, and was delivered and signed for the next day. Whether it ever reached Dr Raine herself, I do not know, but this time I was in luck: just short of one month later (and how many trusting arms were injected and reinjected, I wonder, in those four weeks?) I received the following brief e-mail from Peter, of the MHRA Customer Experience Centre:

    Thank you for your email and we apologise for delay. We have reviewed your enquiry and this has been passed on to our Vigilance Risk Management of Medicines colleagues for further input. Should you have any other questions or requests please feel free to call us . . . etc.

    ….. Debi Evans, nursing correspondent at the UK Column, received an identical email in response to this enquiry of her own:
    ‘Please can you tell me if there is an investigation ongoing with regard to the 2,010 deaths reported after Covid vaccines. Whilst I understand you cannot say if these SAR [serious adverse reactions] were attributable to the vaccines, until there is an investigation we will never know. What procedures do you have in place?
    ‘I note that after only one death from Doxycycline you and CHM recommend a thorough investigation. This drug has been around since the 1960s and has a good track record for safety. I’m concerned you may wish to withdraw this antibiotic based on one case whilst ignoring the thousands of SAR and deaths associated with the Covid-19 vaccine.’
    Why are our concerns being fended off by the MHRA’s chief executive? Why are we receiving no direct answers to our very straightforward questions?

    ‘I’m writing direct to June Raine,’ says Debi, ‘and I’m asking her just a very simple question. Where’s the investigation of the serious adverse reactions? That’s all I want to know. Well, actually I would like to know what that investigation involves and what procedures they use. But the fact that June Raine can’t answer me and has had to side-step this is very suspicious, I think. I mean, why couldn’t she just answer the question? It’s a very simple question, don’t you think?’ (1:22:40 mins in.)

    Yes, it is: a very simple question, which should be very easy to answer, if the MHRA has been diligently fulfilling its duties. So I’ve decided to try again, and have written once more to Dr Raine (who in the meantime, it seems, has become a dame). The following letter should even now be reposing in her inbox, with a hard copy following, recorded delivery:

    Dear Dame June,
    I am writing to you once more because a) my previous letters (attached) have been either ignored or side-tracked into a bureaucratic labyrinth; and b) my concerns regarding your apparent failure to discharge your duties continue to grow.
    My first letter, dated 12 November, 2021, received neither acknowledgement nor reply. In response to my second letter, dated 24 January, 2022, which was once more addressed to you personally and which was sent, this time, by recorded delivery, I have received an e-mail from somebody called Peter at your ‘Customer Experience Centre’ stating that my ‘enquiry has been passed on to our Vigilance Risk Management of Medicines colleagues for further input’. There seems to be some misunderstanding. My questions do not require ‘further input’. What they require is some relevant output from you yourself, as head of the organisation entrusted with ensuring the safety of any new medications ‘offered’ to the public, and especially of those which have been ‘offered’ with a measure of coercion under emergency authorisation only. I would point out that I am not your ‘customer’. Along with the rest of the UK population who pay your salary, I am your employer, and at present you do not appear to be doing the job we pay you for.

    The number of post-injection casualties being reported in relation to the novel injections against SARS-CoV-2 continue to grow. The present totals are 1,458,428 adverse effects recorded by 445,256 people. This includes 2,017 deaths. Your agency has acknowledged that only a small percentage of the actual injuries following vaccination are reported. We can therefore confidently conclude that these figures, even when potential false claims are discounted, fall short of representing the full extent of the harm being inflicted on the people of this country by the premature release and indiscriminate application of what seem to be highly dangerous pharmaceutical products. Since I last wrote, members of my own small circle have experienced unusual and disturbing symptoms in the wake of the injections. In particular, a friend has become blind after ‘doing the right thing’. According to reports logged in the official Yellow Card system, he is but one of over 500 people who have lost their sight after treatment with the experimental medications. In your own estimation (see above) there are likely to be several thousand more sufferers who either have not connected the onset of their disability with the experimental ‘vaccines’, or who do not even know that the Yellow Card records exist.

    Blindness is only one of the devastating injuries being reported in connection with the medications which you have approved for ‘emergency’ use despite the absence of any satisfactory short-term, let alone medium- or long-term safety data, and despite the existence of tried and trusted therapies capable of satisfactorily treating Covid-19 in the early stages. Some one-and-a-half million allegations of adverse events notwithstanding, you appear to be looking the other way as the novel injections you have sanctioned are ‘offered’ to younger and younger children: healthy young human beings who are at greater risk from these ‘vaccines’ than from the disease itself. It is your duty to investigate the Yellow Card reports and present a reasoned and evidenced analysis of your findings to the public, including your grounds for continued endorsement of the products in question, not to brush unprecedented claims of serious adverse reactions aside as the unfounded superstitions of ignorant people. You have seen fit to dismiss the concerns of those afflicted and their friends and relatives. Others have not. Dr Arne Bernhardt, for instance, and other experienced and reputable pathologists carrying out histopathological examinations on behalf of the bereaved are now uncovering evidence which points to the ‘vaccines’ as a likely cause of death. No fewer than 2,017 bereaved families in this country require the same due diligence from you. It is not enough to say, ‘The MHRA takes all reports of fatal events in patients who have received a Covid-19 vaccine very seriously and every report with a fatal outcome is fully evaluated and kept under continual review etc, etc.’ Prove it. Make the evidence you are assessing public, so that it may be thoroughly examined and the conclusions you draw challenged, if they are found wanting, by those with the knowledge and experience to contest them. The fact that many highly esteemed doctors and scientists who have grave misgivings regarding the safety of the medications in question have been ruthlessly smeared, censored and silenced makes absolute transparency on your part essential.

    Perhaps I am misjudging you. In order to clarify your position, it would help if you would respond to the following statements with a straight ‘true’ or ‘false’.

    I, Dame June Raine, as CEO of the MHRA, and hence ultimately responsible for its decisions, am fully aware of the data recorded on the Yellow Card system in relation to the Covid-19 vaccines.

    I, Dame June Raine, do not consider it necessary to present the public with a full written analysis of the 1,458,428 adverse events relating to the Covid-19 vaccines which are recorded by the Yellow Card system, or of my reasons for concluding that they are not, in fact, vaccine injuries.

    I, Dame June Raine, do not consider the 1,458,428 adverse events recorded by the Yellow Card system serious enough to warrant immediate withdrawal of the Covid-19 vaccines.

    I look forward to hearing from you within 20 working days. Should you fail to respond to the above statements, I shall assume that you corroborate them fully. Qui tacet consentire videtur.

    Yours sincerely, etc.

    It is time Dame June justified her recent elevation either by offering credible evidence that the novel injections pose no danger to the public or urging that they be withdrawn forthwith.

    • Debi Evans and Brian Gerrish have done a really good job on UK Column.

      Elderly members of my family who have held the NHS in esteem are now terrified of getting ill after one of them managed to come out of hospital alive with knowing about a DNR order on their medical record.

  7. David:

    As you know, it made no sense medically for me to get the shot. I’d already had the covid, and my healthy immune system enabled me to make a full recovery. I didn’t take any medicine at all. I didn’t even take Ivermectin.

    But I had the shot. to protect my health — because if I didn’t I would have ended up unemployed and broke and homeless, and that would have been hazardous to my health.

    Sixty years of perfect health. Less than thirty days after getting the booster shot I had a stroke.

    While I was in hospital I asked the doc if he thought the shot caused my stroke. His reply blew me away.

    “Well, we’ve been having eighteen-year-olds coming in with strokes, and in those cases it’s pretty obvious what caused it, but at your age it’s not so certain.”

    Can’t argue with that.

    FTR, I feel fine today. Who knows how long that will last?

    It’s personal now.


  8. One Pfize fits all?

    Our favorite vaccine manufacturer currently has on trial for treatment for RSV (Respiratory Syncitial Virus) infections in the over 60’s. This virus may cause bronchiolitis, a wheezy chest condition in babies, or colds in adults. According to the trial protocol, Ventavia in Texas is one of the 264 study sites dotted around the world hoping to recruit 30,000 subjects to test the effectiveness of their RSVpreF vaccine.


    In sunny Pompano Beach, Florida, Invictus Clinical Research Group, another of Pfizer’s carefully selected sites, is also recruiting volunteers.

    Invictus has two Facebook advertisements to attract potential subjects offering an expenses allowance of up to $119.

    One in English:


    and one in Spanish:


    The difference? Only the Spanish Language clip gives the dreadful warning that RSV is highly contagious and potentially lethal for the the over 60’s. Oh and the music.

    The dangers of RSV in adults has been massively exaggerated. Big Pharma will not stop until the whole world is vaccinated against everything.

  9. Argentina is a third world fascist mafia pigsty that took a considerable number of escaping nazi rats out of the defeated 3rd Reich at the end of World War 2, and it shows it, with the enthusiastic collaboration of the Vatican and the peronista Argentinean government of the time and it’s government mandated state religion is dishonesty itself.

    The remains of german submarines full of 3rd Reich nazi escapees and their stolen treasure that crossed the Atlantic in route to Argentina still adorn the arggie beaches where they were left to rot after their last trip out of Europe as a remainder of how welcoming Argentina was for nazis.

    The type of individual that runs Argentina is built around the moral stature and worldview of Martin Ludwig Bormann (17 June 1900 – 2 May 1945), the german nazi party official and head of the hitler’s nazi party chancellery.

    Running any kind of trial in Argentina is worse than giving the results out by throwing dice.

    You ask for a trial that you are going to pay for in Argentina and the first thing you get asked is “what to you want the results to say?”

    Everything has a price and you have the money you can even buy slaves and do what you will with them.

    Anything costing $100 in Argentina goes billed for $400.
    $100 to pay for the stuff.
    $100 to bribe whatever government fascist mafia official involved.
    $100 “extra” for the buyer.
    $100 “extra” for the seller.

    Small wonder Pfizer run “trials” in Argentina.
    And “Hospital Aleman” means “German Hospital” Draw you own conclusions.

Leave a Reply