Forked Tongues. Adverse Event or Adverse Reaction?

July, 6, 2022 | 23 Comments

Comments

  1. “When a test came back negative”

    Covid PCR and RAT tests have a large percent of false negatives. Covid can be confirmed as a diagnosis if anosmia occurs (in the mild case) or silent hypoxia occurs (after covid has progressed).

    I got anosmia recently after contracting covid, so I’m sure the disease was covid. I don’t bother with PCR or RAT.

    • There have been multiple tests – not just PCR but antibodies to spike and N proteints etc – all negative. He didn’t have anosmia. It started within hours of the second does – so on the balance of probabilities what do you think he had. Do you think everyone has Covid?

      D

      • I think that everyone has been exposed to covid and likely has antibodies, even if RATs say ‘no.’ RATs are notoriously unreliable.

        Anosmia is a strong indicator of covid, but its absence is not a strong indicator that an ILI isn’t covid.

        The temporal indicator is a strong indicator that the problems were caused by a vaccine dose.

  2. What an interesting post. Will take a few readings to get my head around it all I suspect.

    I do not have information about someone who took part in a trial but have something of interest, sort of along the same lines, to share here.
    As stated in earlier comments, a member of our withdrawal group is suffering from suspected vaccine damage. Recently, he needed a copy of his medical notes to send to a London doctor who was privately assessing his situation.
    When reading through his medical notes, he came across a sentence ” reported suspected Covid 19″, with a date 4 days following his second jab. He was astounded – he hadn’t been in touch with his GP on that date and hasn’t ever suspected that he had Covid. At that point, he was still working and was regularly tested there – all being clearly negatives.
    He thought that the ‘suspected covid’ comment must have been filed for the wrong person.

    Now, he thinks that he can see things in a much clearer light. His solicitor has told him that the included information will most probably have been added so that all of his present problems can be attributed to the ‘suspected covid’ rather than to a vaccine injury. Apparently doctors are being rewarded for this trickery – anyone else heard of this carry-on? (As we are in the UK, we are well versed in ‘carry ons’ at present!)

      • Hi Augusto, I can certainly share your comment with the individual mentioned. He is very, very unwell at the moment so may be unable to correspond with you – his energy levels and eyesight are affected but I can get his permission to share any developments with you.
        Should he feel that he could share emails with you – would that be a route that you’d like or just in comments here?

    • to Mary H
      Apparently it is a growing trend in various countries
      Twitter search “vaccine claims insurance”
      @liketephlon @henseljim1

      “Funny you say that. The life insurance companies are seeing a 40% increase in payouts due to the vaccinated who got blood clots etc. Many companies are denying payout due to the vaccine being experimental with known risks

      @doey_ann @2222minutes

      “Happening in Europe too.
      French Court Ruled,
      No life insurance payout on grounds that taking an experimental vaccine was akin to suicide.
      Data 40%increase in death. Globally.
      Nothing to see, just a global “coincidence”.
      Leaving “experts” baffled.

  3. Wes Dorman
    @JWesleyDorman

    Replying to
    @redsteeze

    White Medicine Man speak with forked tongue about vaccine effectiveness!

    Chief Nerd
    @chiefnerd
    ·

    ALARMING: Dr. Paul Offit Says He “Felt Like the Fix Was In” by the WHO/FDA on Omicron Boosters During the 6/28 FDA Advisory Committee Meeting “I felt like we were being led here with a critical lack of information”

    https://rumble.com/v1bci85-shocking-dr.-paul-offit-says-he-felt-like-the-fix-was-in-by-the-whofda-on-o.html

    @DrNaomiRWolf @EdwardDowd @MaajidNawaz @rwmalonemd

    Edward Dowd
    @EdwardDowd
    ·
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7f45S6vmQgA

    Folks are catching on…UK excess mortality. Excellent!

    Israeli academic Josh Guetzkow notes that he is also one of the directors of i-trials, the site management organisation ‘paid handsomely by Pfizer to run the trial in Argentina (the largest site of the trial by far)’. Guetzkow adds: ‘If he raised an alarm about the vaccine safety, his company would have lost a ton of money and would be an unlikely choice by any company to run any trials in the future. So to say that he had an interest in achieving a positive trial outcome would be quite an understatement. There may be other conflicts we’re not aware of.’

    The evidence of malpractice and possible fraud in the Pfizer Covid vaccine trials is certainly stacking up now.

    https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/concerns-of-fraud-in-pfizer-vaccine-trial-as-participants-hospitalisation-with-heart-inflammation-is-swept-under-carpet/

    ‘The Secret in Their Eyes’ …

  4. I thought I should point out some of the “errors” in the “narrative”.

    The subject reported severe anxiety on 23 Sep 2020, 14 days after receiving Dose 2.

    Not true -there are NO symptoms of anxiety described in Augusto’s Pfizer records. It is noted that on that date he requested to be informed whether he was in the active vaccine or placebo group of the study.

    On 09 Sep 2020 (Day 20), the subject presented to the emergency room (ER) with fever (body temperature of 39.3 ̊centigrade [C]), malaise, myalgias, headache and nausea.

    Not true – he remained at home until 12 Sep>.

    On the same day night (Day 20), the subject presented again to the ER afebrile (body temperature of 39 ̊C)

    Not true – he did not report to the ER a second time. A temperature of 39 ̊C does not correspond with “afebrile”.

    In the context of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) CoV2 pandemic, the physician decided to evaluate whether these symptoms were associated with SARS CoV2 infection and requested a SARS CoV2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test, which was negative

    No PCR test was done prior to his admission.

    Laboratory tests results were normal and unremarkable except for mild increase in creatinine of 1.21

    No laboratory tests were done before his admission .

    A chest computerized tomogram scan was unremarkable

    Incorrect. The CAT scan on 12 September was reported as showing a pericardial effusion.

    The COVID disease and pneumonia were ruled out and there were no other etiological causes identified for the symptoms that the subject had.

    Not true – Augusto Roux’s discharge summary gave a diagnosis of an adverse reaction to coronavirus vaccine (high probability). This was written by Gisela di Stilio – a senior specialist at the Hospital Alemán.

    The final irony is that there is a note in his Pfizer file dated 12 August 2021 (sic) – almost a year after this adverse reaction/side effect – saying that the anxiety should not be included in the CRF as it started on the day Augusto withdrew from the trial.

    Two questions remain

    Who is responsible for all these errors that have found there way into the “data” that was presented to the FDA? Was it iTRIALS in Buenos Aires? Was it ICON in Ireland? Was it Pfizer in UK? or was it an AI bot?

    How many other erroneous reports are there?

    • “I thought I should point out some of the “errors” in the “narrative”.

      Not true -there are NO symptoms of anxiety described in Augusto’s Pfizer records.”

      Pfizer subcontractor manufactures “facts.”

      “On 09 Sep 2020 (Day 20), the subject presented to the emergency room (ER) with fever (body temperature of 39.3 ̊centigrade [C]), malaise, myalgias, headache and nausea.

      Not true – he remained at home until 12 Sep>”

      Looks like the report author was careless. Perhaps rushed.

      “On the same day night (Day 20), the subject presented again to the ER afebrile (body temperature of 39 ̊C)

      Not true – he did not report to the ER a second time. A temperature of 39 ̊C does not correspond with “afebrile”.”

      MSU. Someone (perhaps the report author) was “making shit up”. Or perhaps confused the facts.

      “A chest computerized tomogram scan was unremarkable

      Incorrect. The CAT scan on 12 September was reported as showing a pericardial effusion.”

      This looks especially bad on top of all the other errors in the report.

      “The COVID disease and pneumonia were ruled out and there were no other etiological causes identified for the symptoms that the subject had.

      Not true – Augusto Roux’s discharge summary gave a diagnosis of an adverse reaction to coronavirus vaccine (high probability). This was written by Gisela di Stilio – a senior specialist at the Hospital Alemán.”

      The only reasonable conclusion is that the Pfizer subcontractor was engaged in a coverup.

  5. “ALARMING: Dr. Paul Offit Says He “Felt Like the Fix Was In” by the WHO/FDA on Omicron Boosters During the 6/28 FDA Advisory Committee Meeting “I felt like we were being led here with a critical lack of information”

    https://rumble.com/v1bci85-shocking-dr.-paul-offit-says-he-felt-like-the-fix-was-in-by-the-whofda-on-o.html

    Reads and sounds like Dr. Paul Offit is feeling the heat from Naomi Wolf her team, Robert Malone and Co. Am beginning to think the Americans could really get some where with making relevant people face up to what is happening. As far as I’m aware this is not happening in psychiatry.

    “Who is responsible for all these errors that have found there way into the “data” that was presented to the FDA? Was it iTRIALS in Buenos Aires? Was it ICON in Ireland? Was it Pfizer in UK? or was it an AI bot?

    How many other erroneous reports are there? ”

    Probably all

    Yuval Noah Harari – “Science isn’t about truth it’s about power”

    lying in psychiatric patients records in psych hospitals and in reply to complaints is a way of dealing with those who make complaints and have akathisia and other SADR’s as a result of the psychiatrists coercive and forced ‘treatments’. They get away with it because there is no real oversight and the historical harms done so terrible the truth must not be allowed to get out. So the patient has to be all but trashed and given a life long serious mental illness label. They are certainly harmed and disabled, mostly not from ‘mental illness’, but from fraud to make massive profit.

  6. “Sociologist Donald Light of Rowan University in New Jersey, US, who has spent decades studying drug regulation, says, “Like the FDA, the TGA was founded to be an independent institute. However, being largely funded by fees from the companies whose products it is charged to evaluate is a fundamental conflict of interest and a prime example of institutional corruption.”

    Light says the problem with drug regulators is widespread. Even the FDA—the most well funded regulator—reports 65% of its funding for the evaluation of drugs comes from industry user fees, and over the years user fees have expanded to generic drugs, biosimilars, and medical devices.

    “It’s the opposite of having a trustworthy organization independently and rigorously assessing medicines. They’re not rigorous, they’re not independent, they are selective, and they withhold data. Doctors and patients must appreciate how deeply and extensively drug regulators can’t be trusted so long as they are captured by industry funding.”

    https://brownstone.org/articles/anatomy-of-the-administrative-state-the-hhs/

  7. Juan Gérvas
    @JuanGrvas

    El excesivo poder de Pfizer [con dos productos de baja calidad, vacuna covid19 y Paxlovid] Pfizer.

    The company’s power worries some vaccinologists [with two products of low quality (covid19 vaccine and Paxlovid]

    How Pfizer Won the Pandemic, Reaping Outsize Profit and Influence

    https://khn.org/news/article/pfizer-pandemic-vaccine-market-paxlovid-outsize-profit-influence/

    Now its mRNA vaccine holds 70% of the U.S. and European markets. And its antiviral Paxlovid is the pill of choice to treat early symptoms of covid. This year, the company expects to rake in more than $50 billion in global revenue from the two medications alone.

    “Hopefully, we could be giving it annually and maybe for some groups that are high-risk more often,” CEO Albert Bourla told investors this year. “Then you have the treatment [Paxlovid] that will, let’s say, resolve the issues of those that are getting the disease.”

    Pfizer was calling the tune.

    “We are a household name right now to billions of people,” Bourla said in January. “People are trusting the Pfizer vaccines.”

    Policies on booster recommendations for different groups are complex and shifting, Offit said, but the CDC, rather than Bourla and Pfizer, should be making them.

    “We’re being pushed along,” he said. “The pharmaceutical companies are acting like public health agencies.”

    Uruguayan Judge Demands Government, Pfizer Turn Over Documents as Court Considers Request to Halt COVID Vaccines for Kids

    Uruguayan government officials and Pfizer were ordered to appear in court Wednesday to provide documents for review regarding vaccine ingredients, adverse effects and contracts shielding the pharma giant from liability.

    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/uruguayan-covid-vaccine-kids-pfizer/

    The order also required Pfizer to state within 48 hours whether it has “admitted, in any area, internal or external to it and its partners, the verification of adverse effects” of its COVID-19 vaccines in children.

    “I applaud Uruguayan judge Recarey for posing many tough questions to Pfizer over its COVID shots and the contracts it imposed on Uruguay,” Mary Holland, president of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), told The Defender in an email.

    “From the beginning, Pfizer has hidden its data and liability-free contracts to avoid liability from the shots,” Holland said.

    She explained:

    “Many countries, including those in Latin America, have relied on U.S. regulatory agencies in the past to guide health policy. But the U.S. regulatory bodies have failed regarding COVID.

    “There is no scientific or ethical justification to authorize COVID shots for children, as some countries, including Denmark, now acknowledge. We know that children are at almost zero risk of dying from COVID. The FDA has extended Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine while illegitimately ‘approving’ Comirnaty, thus engaging in a fraudulent ‘bait-and-switch’ scheme to avoid all liability while hawking ‘approved’ vaccines.”

    Holland said CHD is currently pursuing two lawsuits against the FDA for its arbitrary and capricious decisions on COVID-19 shots, and she is “pleased to see that other countries are stepping into the scientific and legal breach.”

    “I hope Pfizer complies with the judge’s order, but given its long criminal rap sheet, it remains to be seen,” Holland added.

    Rap Sheet…

  8. BBC The Today Programme at 51.22

    Item on Antidepressants at 22.45

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m00193l7

    Edward Dowd
    @EdwardDowd
    ·
    2h

    I concur with Steve… the propaganda momentum has had a second derivative change and soon a tipping point where it’s in free fall.

    Steve Kirsch
    @stkirsch

    The “safe and effective” narrative is falling apart

    Here is my list of 22 leading indicators that the momentum is moving in our favor. I’d be surprised if the narrative doesn’t fall apart soon. It’s now unravelling quickly in the UK.

    https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-safe-and-effective-narrative?r=o7iqo&s=w&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

  9. “People are at risk of having their rights removed under the guise of ‘mental capacity’ then shipped to some ‘care facility’ where they’ll be placed on ‘end of life pathways’ and be sedated with midazolam and other dangerous respiratory depressants.”

    https://twitter.com/KPCResearch/status/1545059273402593287?cxt=HHwWjsCtwaPOk_EqAAAA

    I agree – now it only takes one psychiatrist

    Already been going on

    An “independent” inquiry into the deaths of mental health inpatients in Essex between 2000 and 2020.

    “independent” because the truth about psych drugs will not be allowed to come out

    https://www.emhii.org.uk/

    Hope the vaccine harm people clock this because as things fall apart from them the above is what will happen.

  10. Covid vaccines: Canada to dispose of 13.6 million AstraZeneca doses owing to lack of demand
    BMJ 2022; 378 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o1700 (Published 08 July 2022)

    (Or put another way 13.6 million people avoided potential harms from these vaccines and ‘poorer countries said stuff them , They weren’t as easily manipulated)

    Canada is in the process of destroying 13.6 million expired doses of the Oxford-AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine, more than half of all the doses it has ever bought, because it was unable to find foreign countries willing to take the vaccines, despite pledging to donate them.

    “Due to limited demand for the vaccine and recipient country challenges with distribution and absorption, they were not accepted,” Health Canada said in a statement. Almost all of the vaccines now being thrown away were previously announced as being donated to Covax, the international vaccine access programme set up by the World Health Organization, or to individual countries. But the governments they were intended for chose not to take them.

    The expiration of 13.6 million doses follows the expiration of 1.2 million AstraZeneca doses reported in April and May. Most of the expired doses never left the manufacturers’ warehouses. An unknown but smaller number of doses also expired after distribution to provincial governments.

    But, without manufacturing facilities on its own territory, Canada found itself third in line as the UK and European Union argued over the early production of the AstraZeneca vaccine. The first few shots of Pfizer’s vaccine arrived in Canada four months before the first doses of AstraZeneca’s.

    In March 2021 Canada drew further criticism when it became the only G7 country to draw vaccines from Covax, a system primarily designed to get vaccines to poorer countries. Canada’s government argued that it was one of the biggest relative contributors to Covax and had paid in far more than it had taken out. Any excess doses it ended up with would be donated, the Canadian government said.

    Over four million AstraZeneca doses arrived in Canada from Covax in spring 2021, but at the same time reports began to circulate in Europe of rare blood clotting events after its administration. This led Norway and Denmark to pause and ultimately halt the vaccine’s use.

    Other countries soon followed, and Canada halted the vaccine’s use in under-55s just as it began to arrive in large numbers. Public confidence in the shot collapsed, and its fate in Canada was sealed by the large scale arrival of Pfizer’s vaccine weeks later. Even as covid cases in his province soared, Ontario premier Doug Ford said, “I’d rather wait a month or two for Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson and Johnson than roll the dice on AstraZeneca.”

    Ultimately only about 2.3 million Canadians ever received an AstraZeneca shot. Canada donated most of its doses from Covax back to the programme, part of a total of 17.7 million AstraZeneca doses it would pledge to donate abroad.

    But there was a glut of the vaccine in the Covax system, and the same fears of blood clotting events depressed demand in poor countries. Subsequent research—most recently a large Scandinavian study last month—has shown an increased risk of cerebral venous thrombosis and thrombocytopenia,1 although the absolute risk is small.

    Bruce Aylward, a Canadian specialist in infectious diseases who advises WHO, told the Canadian Press that the country’s handling of AstraZeneca’s vaccine contributed to vaccine hesitancy worldwide. He said that countries like Canada first hoarded all vaccines, then stopped using AstraZeneca and offered it to lower income nations to fulfil their donation promises, fuelling a perception that it was second rate. Often vaccines were donated close to their expiry dates.

  11. I understand from my friend Augusto that he emailed Señora Virginia Braem – the Pfizer study coordinator at Hospital Militar – on October 12 2020 stating:

    ‘Les autorizo a iniciar todos los chequeos de la historia clínica y demás datos que sean de necesidad para el esclarecimiento de los hechos ocurridos en el estudio.’

    Roughly translated this means

    ‘I authorize you to initiate all the checks of the medical history and other data that are necessary for the clarification of the facts that occurred in the study.’

    Why then didn’t Dr Polack obtain the full records of Augusto’s illness and investigations during his admission to Hospital Alemán?

    • The document from which this comment comes has been provided in full by Dr Pedro and has now been added to the post.

      D

  12. The affect and consequence of lies in medical records, here documented by the victim and a really tragic life story

    https://youtu.be/BBJBMXw7-fw?t=255

    This woman was – with an MA in art from the RA – doing yoga in a psych hospital which she found helped her in those terrible circumstances

    What was put in her records: “keeps getting into strange positions ” and “they had it down as a psychotic symptom”

    Sian Whitehead who made the film said in the comments after she had ended her life on Christmas day 2013:

    “This lady’s name is Jean Cozens. In May 2014 I attended the inquest into her death and the Coroner declared it an open verdict not suicide. Jean’s psychiatrists was at the inquest and her evidence was that she put Jean on the medication with her welfare in mind. When the verdict was announced she smiled as it meant she did not have to worry that she had a suicide on her record. The inquest was more of a cover up as to how Jean died. She was found hanging but the psychiatrist and the mental health Trust South London and Maudsley did what they could to persuade the coroner that she did not mean to take her own life. I was disgusted with what I heard at the inquest and I have sent a complaint to S.L.A.M. They did not bother to reply to my complaint after the inquest. Yet.”

    Hat tip to you Dr Pedro

  13. This seems like a red-hot question with this new information now uploaded to Forked Tongues

    “The following conversations with the participant by Dr. Wappner and I, in which we found him in a considerable degree of exaltation, suspicion, intense anxiety, and anger that led him to withdraw from the study and refuse our invitation to stay in it, were reflected in my notes of previous evolution.

    a high degree of anxiety, concern about an alleged conspiracy hatched between the Hospital Alemán and the Military Hospital with the sponsor, and distrust towards the health providers of the Hospital Alemán and the Military Hospital (linked to the confusion of the Hospital Alemán doctor that communicated with the duty emergency doctor and not with a member of the study). This occurs despite having no known current findings (as of the time of their dropping out of the study) of clinical significance.

    but considering that his degree of anguish and concern are considerable; Doing so would allow to reveal the branch of randomization in order to improve the link and dialogue with the ex-participant, and offer to monitor him clinically again for his safety and access -through his authorization- to the records of the Hospital Alemán that detail his previous hospitalization.”

    the volunteer writes authorizing with the following words

    “I authorize you to initiate all the checks of the medical history and other data that are necessary for the clarification of the facts that occurred in the study.”.

    Fernando Polack (fpolack) 130CT2020 16:44

    Visit probable Covid-19 disease Date of visit 23/10/2020

    On 13Sep2020 11:30 hrs, the Sub-investigator Dr Name, communicated by telephone with the patient who informs that he is hospitalized in the Hospital Alemán with suspicion of COVID-19 disease The interrogation shows that, the second dose of the vaccine was applied on SEP 09, 2020

    Augusto was discharged on the September 14 with a diagnosis of adverse reaction to coronavirus vaccine (high probability) – See Discharge Summary.  This was written by Gisela di Stilio – a senior specialist, not a junior doctor.

    https://davidhealy.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/HTAL-Aleman-Epicrisis-Roux-Augusto-G.pdf

     –  and that for Dr Polack this concludes the adverse event (the mental disorder).

    Red-hot…

  14. Perseverance Personified – too hot to handle

    Josh Guetzkow Retweeted

    Prof Martin Neil
    @MartinNeil9

    Matt Hancock resists proper cross examination AFTER he asked the audience for critical questions. Watch the video to see him challenged, by Heiko Khoo, on unsupported claims about asymptomatic transmission and covid modelling.

    https://youtu.be/S97_YfgJvJw

    “in this video Matt demonstrates his belief that something not happening is proof something else works….junk science 101.”

    11 minutes of ‘lasting’ entertainment…right until the end…’a real art form’

  15. BMJ article 13 July

    https://www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj-2021-069445

    “The presentation and clinical course of more than 8000 reported cases of myocarditis and pericarditis is described and some initial reports of longer term outcomes; further, many possible mechanisms are outlined and discussed.

    Incidence of myocarditis is probably the highest in males aged 12-29 years and more likely with Moderna than with Pfizer mRNA vaccines; longer dosing intervals might be beneficial.

    Most cases of myocarditis are mild and self-limiting, but data on children and some severe cases are limited.”

    • “longer dosing intervals might be beneficial.”

      And perhaps run labs looking for cardiac damage.

      Myocarditis from covid isn’t all that rare in the elderly, with higher risk in the vaccinated.

      Clare Craig showed that myocarditis due to covid was 370 per million in the unvaccinated and 580 per million in the vaccinated in elderly VA patients, based on her review of the supplementary data in an article about the risk of myocarditis from covid.

      The absolute risk of myocarditis from covid in the elderly is 0.00037 for the unvaccinated and 0.00058 for the vaccinated. 1 per 2700 in the unvaccinated and 1 per 1700 in the vaccinated.

Leave a Reply