Dos Centavos – Veinte Euros

March, 20, 2023 | 5 Comments


  1. Upstaging ‘Spaghetti Westerns’ …

    “He issues a Silver Euro coin to celebrate the vaccines”

    John Wayne “Get off your horse and drink your milk”

    If I remember rightly, Leonie wrote to the Pope

    Bonnie and Clyde fashion, Isabel Oakeshott, her of the co-writer “Pandemic Diaries”, dumps, in the fashion of James O’Keefe, The Sting…

    Claims the unvaccinated were at higher risk of hospitalisation and death were based on deliberately murky record keeping
    Again, another statistical illusion of efficacy was manufactured by simple miscategorisation

    Norman Fenton

    Prof Norman Fenton

    Update on the flawed hospital data misclassifying vaccinated deaths as unvaccinated

    ….”We no longer hold any of this information, current or previous”

    The Lancet heavily redact their response to our subject access request for internal correspondence relating to rejection of our letter about Pfizer study

    What have they got to hide?

    Norman Fenton

    Prof Norman Fenton Retweeted

    Kathy Gyngell

    The #MHRA is to stop publishing Covid vaccines Yellow Card reports. What a callous way of normalising death and injury. This is far from over – why is it being stopped?

    Pandemic ‘Coup D’état

    The Vigilant Fox 

    : The Manufacturer’s Insert Is the One Place Where Vaccine Companies Tell the Truth The pharmaceutical industry likes to say that they throw the kitchen sink onto the insert to protect themselves from liability — but a Federal law states “only those adverse events for which there is some basis to believe there is a causal relationship between the drug and the occurrence of the adverse event” are allowed to be listed.

    “There’s a lot of science that supports the supposition [that] most of these vaccines, not all of them, but most of them, are causing more injuries and deaths than they are averting,” stated RFK Jr.

    Covid’s cockups and conspiracies

    Australia wasn’t immune

    Rebecca Weisser

    Those debating whether the deadly schemozzle of pandemic mismanagement that has cast a pall over the last three years was due to a cockup or a conspiracy should abandon binary thinking. All the evidence, from both sides of the Atlantic, indicates that there were both cockups and conspiracies and they came not as single spies but in battalions.

    In the UK, the ‘Lockdown files’, a trove of 100,000 WhatsApp messages released by the Telegraph over the last week, provide a portrait of former health minister Matt Hancock as a cruel careerist and a clown better suited to appearing on ‘I’m a Celebrity… Get Me Out of Here’, which he did for a fee of hundreds of thousands of pound, rather than running Britain’s pandemic policy.

    The liberty of millions of Britons was curtailed based on the whims of decision-makers who, because they were not subject to parliamentary scrutiny, simply claimed they were following the best scientific advice.

    Guilt and fear were shamelessly used to enforce the draconian dictates with Hancock writing that he would ‘frighten the pants off everyone’ with a new strain to get compliance.

    A fan of Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum (WEF), Hancock wrote that he hoped Covid would propel his career into the next league. He discussed with his advisers how ‘pushing on vaccines’ would be ‘the most politically beneficial thing’ to do. When Dame Kate Bingham who led the UK vaccine taskforce suggested in October 2020 that only people who were ‘at risk’ should be vaccinated, Hancock branded her as ‘wacky’ and ‘totally unreliable’.
    “only a disaster is likely to produce change.”

    Dr. Augusto Germán Roux
    Feb 28

    This is how they falsified the medical records of the participants in the Pfizer clinical trial covid19, Fernando Polack diagnosed his patients who made complaints about adverse effects with mental health diseases of a constitutive nature. He is not a psychiatrist. This happened

    What Really Happened Inside the COVID-19 Vaccine Trials?

    At this point, the best metaphor I have come up with to describe what I’ve observed regarding enrolling in the pharmaceutical clinical trial process is that it is akin to entering an abusive relationship. The abuser will initially flatter you and promise you one thing after another in return for your consent to enter their web of deception.

    Then, once they have you on board, they will break each promise they made, gradually treating you worse and worse, and gaslighting you into believing that those issues are not really happening.
    Finally, once they no longer need you, they will discard you and leave you to pick up the pieces (which is often almost impossible if you have a life-changing medical injury). Keep this in mind as we review what happened in the COVID-19 trials.

    As I considered all of this, I could not help but wonder “if this was the best they could do using every possible trick at their disposal to rearrange their data to paint a positive picture of the vaccines, just how bad was the actual trial data?”

    A Midwestern Doctor …

  2. A special place in hell for those who did/do believe what people tell them but keep quiet .
    My hope is that one day these drugs will be banned altogether .The risk of harm is too great and unpredictable and yet more are in the pipeline – It’s a pipe dream yet there are novel research projects going deeper into understanding the science using plants (as well as sacrificial animals) They are discovering previously unknown similarities between humans and plants. This isn’t to be confused with theories of consciousness . Plants survive by exploring and reacting to the environment but there are pathways in common. Everything has after all has evolved from the same single cell. The findings go way past just recognising that plants take up and are harmed by drugs or can be used for medicines. If knowledge of the mechanism by which plants are harmed is more and more understood by experimentation – could that not be transferred to understanding human bodies and how drugs act and how people are being harmed? The detail in these articles are beyond my understanding but if anyone is interested they are free to read in the journals.

    Wiley Analytical Science
    Journals Magazine
    Analytical Science Journals
    ELECTROPHORESISVolume 39, Issue 9-10 p. 1301-1308
    Research Article
    Open Access
    Uptake and metabolism of the antidepressants sertraline, clomipramine, and trazodone in a garden cress (Lepidium sativum) model

    Plant Signal Behav. 2021; 16(10): 1927562. Published online 2021 Jun 12. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2021.1927562
    PMCID: PMC8331040PMID: 34120565
    Broadening the definition of a nervous system to better understand the evolution of plants and animals
    Sergio Miguel-Toméa and Rodolfo R. Llinásb

  3. The Boidies…

    An 11-yr-old had to tell me about this bird for the first time.

    recovery&renewal Retweeted

    Dan Johnson

    Replying to

    It’s the conclusion of people who work in this area and understand data and studies: SSRIs are not effective for teens and are dangerous for teens. And prescribing them to teens, and raising the dosage, without informing the parent they live with is reckless disregard for safety.

    AntiDepAware Retweeted

    Dan Johnson
    Mar 22

    Replying to

    Now available: Recorded invited public talk by Dr. David Healy, at the University of Lethbridge:…  

    Background, invited seminar of Dr. David Healy, at the University of Lethbridge:…


    Promoting awareness of the dangers of antidepressants

    “Dr Manoj Kumar, consultant psychiatrist, increased Ms Blezard’s dose of #antidepressants in the months before she died – and told the court it was ‘surprising’ that it had not seemed to work.”

    louis appleby

    Sign of changing seasons in Fletcher Moss park, Manchester. My first chiffchaff of 2023, with its sing-song call, summer bird returning from N Africa. And flock of redwings, winter visitor from Iceland, soon to depart.

    louis appleby Retweeted

    Mar 21

    NEW #AnnualReport2023: Sadly over 1,600 people receiving #mentalhealth care died by #suicide in 2020. We recommend healthcare organisations use our Safer Services toolkit to self-assess their services against our ten key elements of safer care for patients

    “I wonder where the boidies is” …

    Critical issue is feeling untouchable.

    Solution is truly independent body to hear complaints & regulate professional standards.

    Dan Johnson

    Dad, woodturner, scientist, naturalist; Pres, Ent Soc Alberta, 2022, ESCanada, 2000; Prof – biogeography, agriculture, biodiversity, data, experimental design

    The Brooklyn National Anthem…

    Spring has sprung, the grass is ris,
    I wonder where the boidies is
    The boid is on the wing,
    But that’s absoid
    From what I hoid 
    The wing is on the boid!

    Hose’, José, the boid…

  4. Insult to injury. ‘Our sympathy goes to anyone who has reported health problems’.

    Patients launch legal action against AstraZeneca over its covid-19 vaccine
    BMJ 2023; 380 doi: (Published 28 March 2023)
    Cite this as: BMJ 2023;380:p725

    Author affiliations
    Dozens of patients and families are launching legal action against AstraZeneca over a rare side effect of its covid-19 vaccine.

    Lawyers have sent the company pre-action protocol letters, the first step in a legal claim on behalf of around 75 claimants. Some have lost relatives and some have survived with catastrophic injuries following blood clots.

    Many millions have had the vaccine without suffering complications but in 2021 the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency confirmed a possible link between the vaccine, known as Vaxzevria, and a rare condition involving blood clots along with abnormally low platelet levels. Those taking legal action have been diagnosed with vaccine induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia.

    The claimants are pursuing a two pronged strategy: taking legal action under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 as well as claiming payment under the government run Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme. The scheme has paid out in several cases, but is limited to £120 000 per claim and applicants must prove severe disablement.1 Payment under the scheme does not preclude a claim for personal injury through the courts. Those taking action under the Consumer Protection Act must show that the vaccine was not as safe as the public were entitled to expect.

    Peter Todd, a consultant solicitor with Scott-Moncrieff & Associates, one of two lawyers handling claims, told The BMJ that the complications included stroke, heart failure, and leg amputations. He said the technology involved in the AstraZeneca vaccine was “risky.”

    Even though the legal claim is against AstraZeneca, the UK taxpayer will have to pay any compensation awarded, under a legal indemnity that the government gave the company early in the pandemic.

    In response to a freedom of information request, NHS Business Services, which operates the vaccine damage scheme, revealed that by 6 March 2023 the scheme had received 4017 claims relating to a covid-19 vaccine. Of those which had been dealt with, 622 concerned the AstraZeneca vaccine, 348 the Pfizer, and 43 the Moderna vaccine. Of the 4017 claims, 334 were for a death.

    Sarah Moore, a partner in the Hausfeld law firm, whose clients are also taking legal action, said the maximum £120 000 payment from the scheme was “nothing” in cases where the person who was injured or died was a breadwinner. “Many were parents and many were caregivers,” she said.

    MPs, campaigners, and families also argue that the scheme takes too long to decide on payments. The number of administrative staff processing claims has recently been increased from four to 80.

    Damages for individuals in the court action could be in the millions. Moore added, “We’ve been trying to get the government to reform their statutory scheme. We didn’t want to litigate but the government has forced us into a corner. The only way these families can get compensation is to fight the battle they didn’t want to fight.”

    An AstraZeneca spokesperson said the company could not comment on ongoing legal matters, but added, “Patient safety is our highest priority and regulatory authorities have clear and stringent standards to ensure the safe use of all medicines, including vaccines. Our sympathy goes to anyone who has reported health problems.

    “AstraZeneca and regulatory authorities carefully record and assess all reports of potential adverse events associated with use of Vaxzevria. From the body of evidence in clinical trials and real world data, Vaxzevria has continuously been shown to have an acceptable safety profile and regulators around the world state that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks of extremely rare potential side effects.”

Leave a Reply