• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Dr. David Healy

Psychiatrist. Psychopharmacologist. Scientist. Author.

  • About
  • Blog
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Cause & Effect
  • Politics of Care
  • Resources

Swallowed Whole or Murdered: Malcharist

August 10, 2020 Leave a Comment

Patrick Hahn has written the first Riff on Malcharist which is now posted on Samizdat reproduced below.

What Paddy Chayefsky’s Network was to the Twentieth Century, Paul John Scott’s Malcharist is to the Twenty-First. This is a novel that takes the reader deep inside the Pharmaceutical Empire which invents diseases, creates “patient advocacy organizations” to sell these diseases to the public, manufactures and controls the evidence base purporting to show their nostrums are safe and effective remedies for these diseases, relentlessly gaslights those unfortunate victims harmed by their patent medicines, and smears all who question any of this as “Luddites, anti-vaxxers, tin-foil hatters, and Scientologists.”

Scott interleaves the stories of the chief protagonists – a hack journalist who has inadvertently stumbles onto the biggest story of his career, a brilliant but disillusioned ghost writer for the drugmakers, a sociopathic talk-show psychiatrist, along with several others, to paint a vivid portrait of a world probably few of us even suspect exists – a world of fantastic opulence kings would envy, along with gutter-level cynicism that would gag a goat.

This novel will swallow you whole. Beginning with the first few pages, a feeling of dread begins to take hold, a sensation that only intensifies as the author takes us through one plot twist after another until the distinction between the good guys and the bad guys becomes hopelessly blurred, while the author’s meticulous attention to detail creates a sensation as close to virtual reality as the printed page will ever get.

To paraphrase Aristotle, you may not be interested in the drug companies, but that won’t stop the drug companies from taking an interest in you. This is a novel everybody needs to read.

By chance there was a homicide last week in Belgium that brings home the themes of Malcharist all too well. Luc Cuvelier got in touch wondering not so much about the homicide as the machinery that swung into place to deny any possible link to the drug the homicider was on.  His email is here.

Earlier this week, the former mayor of my hometown Aalst in Belgium was killed by her current boyfriend, who had just gone to see a psychiatrist days before the murder. He was prescribed Wellbutrin. When I first heard about the crime I thought: I bet the killer was on some kind of psychoactive prescription drug. No one believed me when I said this. But then the next day it was all over the Flemish press that the boyfriend was indeed seeing a psychiatrist and that he had just been put on an antidepressant.
This is how he killed her: she was asleep, he went to look for a hammer and beat her to death. Then the next morning, he spontaneously went to the police to turn himself in. He says he doesn’t know why he did it. He talks about some kind of blackout or “not being himself”. In the press, he is portrayed as an extremely violent person because he does seem to have a history of aggression and violence (but no one got killed) and therefor his murdering the former mayor must be considered as “premeditated”. But I have never heard of such a thing. Why did he murder his girlfriend in her sleep when he had already agreed to seek professional help from a psychiatrist? And why did he turn himself in the way he did?
Of course, after it got leaked that he was taking prescription drugs, the Flemish board of psychiatrists immediately insisted that Wellbutrin is totally safe and that it cannot explain why the murder happened. They say no expert will ever link this homicide to the side-effects of Wellbutrin. But when I checked the insert of this antidepressant and also its Wikipedia page, it clearly says “aggression” and “psychosis” as possible side-effects. So Flemish psychiatrists are obviously lying and covering up the truth. They also think we are stupid and cannot check for ourselves if what they say is true or not.
Here are articles in English – One – Two – about what happened to the former mayor (they talk about a “psychologist” but I can confirm you that it was definitely a psychiatrist; psychologists are not allowed to prescribe drugs).

Luc then asks – What do you think about this?

This Belgium story comes straight out of Malcharist.  If you want a great picture of a bunch of psychiatrists chomping free food at the pharma trough to prepare them for telling the media that of course no expert would ever make a link between Wellbutrin and a murder like this – read Malcharist.

If you want terrifying descriptions of what the mental state is that drugs can induce that lead on to “suicide” or “homicide” read Malcharist.

If you want a great characterization of  Glaxo Wellcome’s and later GlaxoSmithKline’s business plan for drugs like Wellbutrin which include ghostwriting the entire literature on drugs like this and creatively coding the problems out of existence, read Malcharist.

What you don’t have just yet, but coming soon, is Ilse’s parents or maybe children or someone else close to her, becoming a spokesperson in patient groups for the need to make sure we pick up the first hints of depression, this terrible disease, detection in the womb is not too early, to make sure we get people on drugs like Wellbutrin, Pristiq, Spravato and others.

And its almost pointless writing this because as Malcharist will tell you – I’m selling antidepressants by doing so.

But for the record:

Wellbutrin can cause homicide.

Do I know or do Belgian psychiatry know whether it did or not?  No-one can know without the full facts of the case and interviewing the boyfriend but the timeframe and the mode of the murder fits very well with the idea that it in fact did cause this homiciede.  But for Wellbutrin there is a good chance Ilse would be alive today.

I can say one more thing with confidence – the senior people in whatever Belgian psychiatry organisation is being tapped for a view here almost certainly know nothing about making the kind of assessments needed  in a case like this.  The common sense of Luc Cuvelier is likely worth a lot more that the combined wits of senior Belgian psychiatrists.

Subscribe to the mailing list
Get notified when a new blog post is published.
By subscribing, you agree with our privacy policy and our terms of service.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Unsafe Safety
  • Six Weeks to Recover a Grin
  • An Appleby a Day Keeps the Doctor Away
  • Tangled up in Bureaucracy
  • The Respiratory Syncytial Virus Challenge

Categories

Footer

Contact

Terms | Privacy

Follow

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Search

Copyright © 2025 · Data Based Medicine Global Ltd.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.Ok