BMJ 1999;318:949 ( 3 April )
Reviews
Multimedia
Unauthorized Freud: Doubters Confront A Legend
Ed Frederick Crews
Viking Press, £20, pp 301
ISBN 0 670 87221 0
Freud 2000
Ed Anthony Elliott
Polity Press, £13.95, pp 308
ISBN 0 7456 1909 6






Rating: 

, 
It started in the 1970s. At first,
the outcome seemed unpredictable. The latest high tech weapons pitched
against a wily adversary with mysterious weapons of unknown lethality.
But in the end the result was clear. Repeated attacks by Roazen,
Ellenberger, Swales, Sulloway, Cioffi, Masson, and others put the issue
beyond doubt. Before the end it was almost like a turkey shoot.
Fatefully, perhaps, the victors did not press home their advantage to
the full. They withdrew, leaving the defeated analysts to reposition
themselves. Some of the analysts' efforts to regroup led to their
containment behind the sanctions of evidence based medicine, legal
precedents, protocols, and guidelines, which established substantial
"no fly" zones. An unsatisfactory outcome for some, notably
Frederick Crews, who feared that, notwithstanding the conclusive
outcome to the first engagements, a source of dangerous contagion
remained intact.
The latest hostilities were triggered by a successful sanctions busting
manoeuvre. Ever resourceful, the analysts recently managed to get the
Library of Congress to support an exhibition on "the importance of
psychoanalytic ideas" and "the enduring discoveries of [Freud's]
revolutionary genius." This has led to a series of stinging replies,
one of which is Unauthorized Freud. On one level, there
can be little doubt about the outcome this time round.
Unauthorized Freud contains as many "Crews missiles" as were launched in the original conflict, consisting as it does of a
selection of reprints from the works of Freud's better known critics
of the most telling historical investigations of his actual therapeutic
endeavours, the most incisive logical analyses of his premises, and the
most detailed critiques of how the analytic regime manages to hang on
to power. For precision invective and clinical finishing, this volume
is hard to beat.
And yet there can be room for uneasiness. Crews is in breach of
several technicalities. He attributes the recovered memory movement to
Freudianism, whereas it is essentially the antithesis of
psychoanalysis. He focuses almost exclusively on the clinical domain
and fails to address the new terrain on which the analysts have
regrouped, that of literature and the humanities. Anyone, it seems, who
is not for his position, anyone who is prepared to concede that
analytic approaches may have some merit (he cites Micale and
Showalter), is against him. This surely betrays an inability to muster
a broad based coalition for further hostilities.
It is hard to avoid the feeling that it would have been more useful to
see this arsenal targeted against the biobabble and its institutional
underpinnings that has succeeded the psychobabble of yesteryear. Before
the end, one longs for a celebration of the glories of analytic culture
and its contribution to the dynamics of modernity and postmodernity.
This is what Anthony Elliott's Freud 2000 sets out to
provide. Unfortunately, this book, despite a number of stimulating
contributions, will largely appeal only to insiders. The moment calls
for an engagement of those who don't already speak the language, those
who live outside the ghetto. It calls for efforts to bridge the divide.
These chapters will speak only to those who are already listening. The
standoff continues.
David Healy, director.
North Wales Department of
Psychological Medicine, Bangor
© BMJ 1999